Elements Of Health

Alternative Health and Healing Secrets!

One more proof that vaccines don’t work!!!

.One more proof that vaccines don’t work!!!

 

<http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&q=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1392594/Pneumonia-jabs-pensioners-scrapped-dont-work.html%3Fito%3Dfeeds-newsxml&ct=ga&cad=CAcQARgAIAAoATAAOABAuaqR7wRIAVAAWABiBWVuLVVT&cd=RWInWtaQQ7A&usg=AFQjCNFOHum7aINjFeupTnJiy5gLLvoIrg>

Pneumonia
Pneumonia jabs for pensioners to be scrapped 'as they don't work'
Daily Mail
But independent experts on the Joint Committee on Vaccination and
Immunisation (JCVI), which advises the Government, claim it has had
'no discernible impact' on rates of pneumococcal disease. It said the
protection provided by the vaccine is poor and ...

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email
courses - next classes start April 22

--------------------------------------------

US Government Concedes Hep B Vaccine Causes Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Here we present the US Federal Court’s decision and order in full below.

The claimant in this case was dead when the damages were awarded. Tambra Harris died on November 9, 2009. Tambra’s mother and Administratix of her estate, Louvonia Deniece Harris, was substituted as petitioner, and an amended petition was filed on October 15, 2010.

Hepatitis B vaccine is given to US infants at birth for a disease which they are not at risk of.

Why? At risk groups are intravenous “recreational” drug abusers and those who practice unsafe sex – which rules out new born babies.

Whilst the risk factors for babies have changed little, there is now impressive evidence that for a preventive measure, hepatitis B vaccine is remarkable for the frequency, variety and severity of complications from its use. The toxicity of this vaccine is so unusual that, even if crucial data are regrettably concealed or covered by Court order, scientific evidence is already far higher than normally needed to justify severe restrictive measures.

Quote from French expert Dr. Marc Girard.  See CHS article below for full details: UK Government Caught Lying On Baby Hep B Vax Safety.  Whilst other evidence is embargoed by the French Courts, Dr Girard has been able to publish a scientific review of the unembargoed evidence from the French Courts of the vaccine’s hazards (Autoimmun Rev 2005; 4: 96-100). Dr Girard shows that French health authorities suppress studies demonstrating serious risks. Hepatitis B vaccine has been shown in many peer reviewed research papers [including from Harvard University - detailed references at end] to be associated with numerous infant deaths in the USA and Europe, multiple sclerosis and numerous chronic auto-immune disorders [see below for more details].

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 01-499V
(E-Filed: March 23, 2011)

TO BE PUBLISHED -  Stipulated Damages; Hepatitis B Vaccine; Alleged Injuries Include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

_______________________________________
LOUONIA DENIECE HARRIS,
Administratrix of the Estate of TAMBRA
HARRIS,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.
______________________________________

STIPULATED DAMAGES DECISION1

On August 29, 2001, Tambra Harris (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation alleging that she suffered certain injuries as a result of receiving a vaccination. 2

Among the injuries petitioner alleged that she had suffered as a result of receiving a hepatitis B vaccination was systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).  She sought an award under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program 3

On March 22, 2011, counsel for both parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The parties stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $ 475,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as Administratrix of the Estate of Tambra Harris. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a);

and

A lump sum payment of $ 9,914.00 in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and the State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid, Attn: Ms. Carolyn Hall Williams, Third Party Liability Unit, 550 High Street, Walter Sillers Building, Suite 1000, Jackson MS 39201, for reimbursement of Mississippi’s Medicaid expenses related to Tambra’s care.

Stipulation ¶ 8(a) and ¶ 8(b).

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made in the form of a check payable to petitioner as Administratrix of the Estate of Tambra Harris in the amount of $ 475,000.00.   In addition, an additional award should be made in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and the State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid in the amount of $ 9,914.00. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Special Master.

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, “the entire” decision will be available to the public. Id. (the Act or the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.

2 Tambra Harris died on November 9, 2009. Tambra’s mother and Administratix of her estate, Louvonia Deniece Harris, was substituted as petitioner, and an amended petition was filed on October 15, 2010.

3 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the Program). 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

___________________________________________________________________

UK Government Caught Lying On Baby Hep B Vax Safety

Posted on April 13, 2009

The British Government has been caught lying this week in news reports in two British Sunday newspapers about a proposal to give 8 week old British babies Hepatitis B vaccinations.

A Department of Health spokesman was quoted claiming:-

The safety of children is always paramount whenever decisions are taken regarding what vaccines are included as part of the child vaccination programme.New vaccination fears over plan to give hepatitis jabs at eight weeks old Mail on Sunday 12th April 2009, Vaccination fears over plan for Hepatitis B jabs for babies : Sunday Telegraph 12 Apr 2009.

Only cost and not safety is legally permitted to be an objection under the UK New Labour Government’s new law in effect from April 1 this year [full details below].  Whilst 8 week old babies are not at risk from Hepatitis B, they are from the vaccine [full details below].  And six five EU Hepatitis B vaccines have lost their marketing authorisations since 2000, the latest being last week – GlaxoSmithKline’s Hepatitis B Energix B vaccine [full details below].

Hepatitis B vaccine has been shown in many peer reviewed research papers [including from Harvard University - detailed references at end] to be associated with numerous infant deaths  in the USA and Europe, multiple sclerosis and numerous chronic auto-immune disorders.  These latter include Guillain-Barre syndrome, lupus, rheumatism, blood disorders and chronic fatigue.  The only potential claimed infant risk group is alleged to be babies born in the UK to mothers from countries with claimed-to-have high rates of infection.  Around 2000 British born infants are already being vaccinated annually in the UK.  At risk groups are intravenous “recreational” drug abusers and those who practice unsafe sex – which rules out 8 week old babies.

There has been a criminal judicial investigation in France into the adverse effects of this vaccine.  France was the first country to introduce universal Hepatitis B vaccination and saw effects  which included the first ever seen and harrowing cases of childhood multiple sclerosis in France.

Research also shows that the prevalence of Hepatitis B is low in the UK, consistent with previous estimates and suggesting that many infections were acquired outside the UK. This all suggests Government should concentrate its efforts on effective treatment rather than vaccination of infants against a disease which does not affect them. Proponents of the vaccination claim rates of Hepatitis B infection are “spiralling” but based on “estimates”. Regrettably “estimates” can be “pulled” in one direction or another depending on which direction those responsible for the “estimates” are more interested in seeing them move.  And in these circumstances, they can never be justification for vaccinating all babies to protect adult drug abusers and practitioners of unsafe sex.

Additionally, UK and EU authorities have withdrawn marketing licences for6 5 Hepatitis vaccines claiming a lack of efficacy in some cases, voluntary withdrawal by the applicant in others and denying in one case [Hexavac] any association with 6 infant deaths in Germany. The deaths were reported in a 2005 research paper as possibly caused by the vaccine:Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination.” Zinka B, Rauch E, Buettner A, Rueff F, Penning R. – Vaccine. 2005 May 18.

The most recent vaccine to lose its authorisation was last Last week the UK Medicines  and Healthcare Products regulatory Agency withdrewrequired recall of a batch of GlaxoSmithKline’s Hepatitis B Engerix Bvaccine marketing authorisation with Professor Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA stating:-

The safety of the vaccine is not in question, but it is suspected to be ineffective.” MHRA recalls GSK’s Hepatitis B vaccine - 07 Apr 2009 - Regulatory Affairs – Hays Pharma News

The other most recent vaccine to lose its European marketing authorisation was  Quintanrix [also from GSK] in August last year. The other vaccines are: Infanrix [GSK], Hepacare [Celltech] and Primavax [Aventis Pasteur].

So if ‘The safety of children is always paramount’ why the British Department of Health is even contemplating such a vaccine for 8 week old babies is beyond comprehension.”

And do vaccines cause autistic conditions?  If you read nothing else we strongly recommend you read this: PDF Download – Text of May 5th 2008 email from US HRSA to Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News].  In it the US Health Resources Services Administration [HRSA] state to CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson

We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures.

After the Hannah  Poling story broke in the USA in February 2008 [see CHS article here] under the media spotlight numerous US health officials and agencies conceded on broadcast US nationwide TV news from CBS and CNN. Full details with links to the original sources can be found in this CHS article: Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines. Hannah developed an autistic condition after 9 vaccines administered the same day.

But there is worse to come and it shows the UK’s New Labour Government has been irresponsible handing recently from 1st April 2009 legal power to dictate vaccination policy exclusively to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation: UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination.  The JCVI regrettably has a demonstrable track-record of recklessness on safety up to and including the present day, as shown in FOI documents: British Government’s Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety and UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination.

The DoH statement published in The Mail on Sunday is also untrue because:-

  • Under the new law The Health Protection (Vaccination) Regulations 2009 which came into effect on 1st April for England only, the Secretary of State has no power on the grounds of safety to refuse to implement or reverse any Joint Committe on Vaccination and Immunisation recommendation
  • the JCVI expressly has no remit to take safety into account in its decision-making
    • [that role is supposedly the MHRA's but regrettably they seem to rubber stamp a great deal of what the drug industry come up with - as has been shown time and again and not just with vaccines, but drugs like Seroxat - the "anti-depressant" shown not to work compared to placebo in some trials and which causes adolescents to be 3 times more likely to commit suicide in others.]
  • the only consideration the Secretary of State can take into account in rejecting JCVI recommendations is cost-effectiveness – not safety
  • contrary to the UK Department of Health claims, no childhood vaccines used on British children have ever been tested according to the gold standard of evidence – randomised placebo controlled clinical trials.
  • health officials refuse to ensure large scale studies of total health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals are carried out.  These should show differences in overall health between these groups and some medical professionals believe this is because the studies would reveal the unvaccinated are healthier overall and high levels of chronic diseases in vaccinated individuals.
  • there is no clinical benefit to infants from Hepatitis B vaccine but infants are put at risk of the known and unknown adverse effects
  • this also means doctors and nurses are being expected to behave unethically and possibly criminally – because no caring parent will consent to a vaccine administered to an 8 week old baby on being told there are risks but no benefits

The main reason for the new drive to more and more vaccines – and this is well published in the trade press – is that the drug industry has been changing its business model.  The financial markets have known for many years the old model would fail – that of patented “blockbuster” drugs:-

  • the drug industry have made vaccines the new growth area because they are highly lucrative
    • they are drugs everyone gets – it is the same business model of Bill Gates’ Microsoft – pretty much everyone has to have Windows software – pretty much everyone gets vax’d
    • and the drug industry has been working hard behind-the-scenes to pursuade everyone – especially legislators – that they are vital when they are not and lobbying for changes in law just like this new law – which was introduced without Parliamentary debate and appears to be unlawful per se: UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of  Childhood Vaccination

Dr Marc Girard, a specialist in the side effects of drugs and commissioned as a medical expert by French courts in the French criminal investigation into the introduction of universal Hepatitis B vaccination in France,suggests that even in high-endemic countries, the risk/benefit ratio of what he describes as “this unusually toxic vaccine” must be carefully re-assessed.

Regarding the health situation in the UK Dr Girard says the conclusion not to vaccinate is obvious. France was the first country to implement universal hepatitis B vaccination in 1994.

Whilst other evidence is embargoed by the French Courts, Dr. Marc Girard has also been able to publish a scientific review of the unembargoed evidence of the vaccine’s hazards (Autoimmun Rev 2005; 4: 96-100). Dr Girard shows that French health authorities suppress studies demonstrating serious risks.

Dr Girard has previously said:

Whilst the risk factors for babies have changed little, there is now impressive evidence that for a preventive measure, hepatitis B vaccine is remarkable for the frequency, variety and severity of complications from its use. The toxicity of this vaccine is so unusual that, even if crucial data are regrettably concealed or covered by Court order, scientific evidence is already far higher than normally needed to justify severe restrictive measures.

______________________________________

REFERENCES

UK & EU MARKETING AUTHORISATION WITHDRAWALS

  • MHRA recalls GSK’s Hepatitis B vaccine - 07 Apr 2009 - Regulatory Affairs – Hays Pharma News
  • Public Statement on Quintanrix (Common name: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine) Withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation in the European Union – 29/08/08 –EMEA/424484/08
  • EMEA announces recommendation for suspension of the marketing authorisation for Hexavac – EMEA/297369/2005
  • EMEA Withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation for the Medicinal Product Hepacare (Triple hepatitis B recombinant vaccine)EMEA/32933/02- 20/12/02
    • Public Statement on Hepacare (Triple hepatitis B recombinant vaccine)17/12/02 – EMEA/32933/02
  • Withdrawal of the Marketing Authorisation for the Medicinal ProductPrimavax (Diptheria, Tetanus, and Hepatitis B vaccine) – 04/12/00 – EMEA/H/2681/00

______________________________________

DEATHS, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND OTHER ADVERSE EFFECTS

  • “Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination.” Zinka B, Rauch E, Buettner A, Rueff F, Penning R. – Vaccine. 2005 May 18

Vaccinations are considered to be the most effective and safe method preventing infectious diseases. Although hexavalent vaccines like Hexavac((R)) and Infanrix Hexa((R)) are assumed to be well tolerated and safe regarding the rate of immunity  [Liese JG, Stojanov S, Berut F, Minini P, Harzer E, Jow S, et al. Large scale safety study of a liquid hexavalent vaccine (D-T-acP-IPV-PRP-T-HBs) administered at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14 months of age. Vaccine 2002;20:448-54; Mallet E, Fabre P, Pines E, Salomon H, Staub T, Schodel F, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent combines vaccine compared with separate administration of reference licensed vaccines in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:1119-27], it was noticed that several cases of death occurred shortly after the vaccination. We report six cases of sudden infant death that occurred within 48h after hexavalent vaccination. At post-mortal examination, those cases showed unusual findings, especially in the brain and in laboratory tests. Crude calculations of local epidemiology are compatible with an association between hexavalent vaccination and unusual cases of sudden infant death. If confirmed in systematic studies, our findings would have potentially serious clinical implications.

Neonatal Deaths After Hepatitis B Vaccine – The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1991-1998 – Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:1279-1282

Results: Of 1771 neonatal reports, there were 18 deaths in 8 boys and 9 girls (1 patient unclassified). The mean age at vaccination for these 18 cases was 12 days(range, 1-27 days); median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 2 days (range, 0-20 days); and median time from symptoms to death was 0 days (range, 0-15 days). The mean birth weight of the neonates (n = 15) was 3034 g (range, 1828-4678 g). The causes of death for the 17 autopsied cases were sudden infant death syndrome for 12, infection for 3, and 1 case each of intracerebral hemorrhage, accidental suffocation, and congenital heart disease. Conclusion: Few neonatal deaths following HepB vaccination have been reported, despite the use of at least 86 million doses of pediatric vaccine given in the United States since 1991. While the limitations of passive surveillance systems do not permit definitive inference, these data suggest that HepB immunization is not causing a clear increase in neonatal deaths.

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis

NEUROLOGY 2004;63:838-842

A prospective study

Miguel A. Hernán, MD, DrPH, Susan S. Jick, DSc, Michael J. Olek, DO and Hershel Jick, MD

From the Department of Epidemiology (Dr. Hernán), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program (Drs. Susan S. Jick and Hershel Jick), Boston University, Lexington, MA; and Department of Neurology (Dr. Olek), College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.

Background: A potential link between the recombinant hepatitisB vaccine and an increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) hasbeen evaluated in several studies, but some of them have substantialmethodologic limitations.

Methods: The authors conducted a nested case-control study withinthe General Practice Research Database (GPRD) in the UnitedKingdom. The authors identified patients who had a first MSdiagnosis recorded in the GPRD between January 1993 and December2000. Cases were patients with a diagnosis of MS confirmed throughexamination of medical records, and with at least 3 years ofcontinuous recording in the GPRD before their date of firstsymptoms (index date). Up to 10 controls per case were randomlyselected, matched on age, sex, practice, and date of joiningthe practice. Information on receipt of immunizations was obtainedfrom the computer records.

Results: The analyses include 163 cases of MS and 1,604 controls.The OR of MS for vaccination within 3 years before the indexdate compared to no vaccination was 3.1 (95% CI 1.5, 6.3). Noincreased risk of MS was associated with tetanus and influenzavaccinations.

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the hypothesisthat immunization with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine isassociated with an increased risk of MS, and challenge the ideathat the relation between hepatitis B vaccination and risk ofMS is well understood.

Received March 31, 2004. Accepted in final form May 8, 2004.

“Multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccination: Adding the credibility of molecular biology to an unusual level of clinical and epidemiological evidence” Comenge Y; Girard M (Med Hypotheses, doi 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.08.012)

“Autoimmune hazards of hepatitis B vaccine” Girard M (Autoimmun Rev 2005; 4:96-100) (Text available in electronic form on request.)

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

Hep B Vaccine causes MS

Points on hepatitis B vaccination
Points  Hepatitis vaccination

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/point.html

1.  Hepatitis B vaccination is an extremely lucrative business

"Developed by Chiron (Emeryville, CA), the hepatitis B vaccine--which racked up over $2 billion in worldwide sales last year--was licensed to Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ), which subsequently licensed it to SmithKline Beecham (SKB, Philadelphia, PA). Biogen (Cambridge, MA) also played a role in developing the product and still receives royalties on its sales from both Merck and SKB, as does Chiron."--BJ Spalding  http://www.biospace.com/articles/111199_print.cfm

2.  There is doubt that a virus even exists!

"If you read the literature very carefully, you will find that, while there is a strong marker for the disease, there is no hard scientific evidence to support the existence of a hepatitis C virus. Clearly, a non-A, non-B hepatitis disease exists, but the science behind an associated virus is weak at best.  As a scientist I am compelled to ask, how can we vaccinate people against a disease-causing agent that has not been fully characterized?"---Dr Urnovitz

3.  A simple therapy for hepatitis is available but the allopaths wont use it due to medical politics

"So far, I have never seen a case of acute viral hepatitis which was treated immediately with intravenous sodium ascorbate in the acute stage which ever persisted and went on to the chronic stage.  Usually, the jaundice is cleared in 4 to 5 days.  The SGOT and SGPT start dropping precipitously after the first IVC.  The patient feels better in 2 or 3 days.  Apparently the skin is stained and that is why the jaundice takes so long to go away.  It confounds me as to why this inexpensive, simple, nontoxic  treatment will not be applied to patients."--Dr Cathcart

4.   A French court found that hepatitis B vaccine was the cause of multiple sclerosis

"British Firm to Compensate Two French Multiple Sclerosis Victims"
Agence France Presse (www.afp.com) (05/03/01)
A French court has upheld a lower court ruling that found a link between GlaxoSmithKline's hepatitis B vaccine and multiple sclerosis (MS) and has ordered the company to pay two women who contracted MS after receiving the vaccine an as-yet undetermined amount of compensation.  The ruling is important, because it rejected arguments that a direct and irrefutable link between the vaccine and MS is needed, said Gisele Mor, the plaintiffs' attorney.  "It ruled that barring scientific evidence, serious, precise, and similar evidence was enough proof," Mor noted.

This is old news on this vaccine and MS.

"My involvement in the field of vaccine toxicity began in 1979 when I discovered that central nervous system demyelination (Multiple Sclerosis) had been caused, in some individuals, by the swine flu vaccine. My involvement was heightened when I found the same thing occurred after hepatitis B vaccination. These findings have been confirmed by many others and have been extended to include other untoward reaction to hepatitis B vaccine. Reactions include other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, optic neuritis, postvaccinal encephalomyelitis and possibly juvenile diabetes."--Dr Waisbren

"I have obtained the FDA adverse reaction list of over 8000 individuals with reported adverse reactions for the past 4 years (Merck vaccine only, does not include the Smith Kline vaccine which I have been told includes another 15,000 or more). The vast majority of adults who have these same symptoms including rash, joint pain, chronic fatigue, neurological disorders, neuritis, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus like syndrome and multiple sclerosis like syndrome."--Dr Bonnie Dunbar

The warning on the package insert looks to be about right although will they take "no causal relationship" out in future?

"Less common systemic complaints, not necessarily related to vaccine, include low-grade fever, malaise, fatigue, arthralgia, arthritis, myalgia, headache, dizziness, syncope, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, lymphadenopathy, abnormal liver function tests, and rashes, rarely including urticaria. Severe skin disorders such as erythema multifonne have exceptionally occurred. .....Neurological manifestations occurring in temporal association have been reported with the vaccine and include very rarely paraesthesia and extremely rarely paralysis, neuropathy and neuritis including Guillain-Barre syndrome, optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. No causal relationship has been established."--EngerixB

Fancy a mixture with hep A vaccine?

TwinrixAdult (Hep A & B)
"very rarely reported: allergic reactions mimicking serum sickness, vasculitis, syncope, hypotension, lymphadenopathy, cases of peripheral and/or central neurological disorders, and may include multiple sclerosis, optic neuritis, myelitis, Bell’s palsy, polyneuritis such as Gullain-Barré syndrome (with ascending paralysis), meningitis, encephalitis, encephalopathy, thrombocytopenic purpura, erythema exsudativum multiforme."---Twinrix Adult

VAERS reports show numerous deaths and serious reactions.

"The total 24,775 VAERS hepatitis B reports from July 1990 to October 31, 1998 show 439 deaths and 9673 serious reactions involving emergency room visits, hospitalization, disablement or death.........The hep B adverse event cover-up is way bigger then the AHP diet-drug cover up."--Michael Belkin   

Don't forget that doctors only report from 2-10% of adverse reactions.

"Before the latest round of injections, we had 205 parents contact us over a 5 year period....But only seven of those cases have been officially reported by doctors (3.4%)."---Jacki Fletcher of JABS (MMR vaccine)

You don't need package inserts of VAERS reports to find out about the vaccines adverse reactions.  There are numerous citations (which seem more than any other vaccine) along with numerous personal testimonies

According to a recent federal government study, serious adverse events after the vaccine -including 48 deaths - are reported three times as frequently as cases of hepatitis B in children under the age of 14.

"The statistic that is often quoted is that there are 25,000 kids are infected with Hepatitis B.  After repeatedly asking the question as to how the CDC arrived at this number, Harold S. Margolis, MD, Chief of the Hepatitis Branch of the CDC finally admitted that 25,000 kids is simply an estimate.  They have no hard proof that there are definitely 25,000 kids with Hepatitis B.
2. According to Harold S. Margolis, MD, Chief of the Hepatitis Branch of the CDC, in 1997 there were 95 children under the age of 2 in the United States who were diagnosed with Hepatitis B.  According to Susan Ellenberg, PhD, Director of the Division of Biostatistics and Epidimiology, FDA stated in the same year, 1997, thatthere were 43 deaths following the vaccine in children under the age of 2.  She would not state that the vaccine caused the death but did acknowledge that the deaths occurred shortly after the vaccine and there was an "association" between the children's deaths and the vaccine. She was very careful of her wording.
3. Amazingly, according to Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (1994), "90-95% of all hepatitis B cases recover completely after 3-4 weeks of nausea, fatigue, headache, arthritis, jaundice and tender liver."  I keep remembering the children who died and how they will NEVER recover.
4. Neither Dr. Margolis nor Dr. Ellenberg would answer the question as to whether the risks of the vaccine outweigh the benefits from the vaccine."--Lisa F. Reiss

5.  Hepatitis B is primarily an adult disease, risk is highly dependent on lifestyle, i.e.multiple sex partners, drug abuse or an occupation with exposure to blood, yet it is now given to children.

"The risk factors include: sexually active heterosexual adults with more than one sex partner in the prior six months or a history of sexually transmitted disease; homosexual and bisexual men; illicit injection drug users; persons at occupational risk of infection; hemodialysis patients; household and sex contacts of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection; and infants born to hepatitis B infected women."--Dr Waisbren MD

Does that look like a profile for the vaccination of babies with this vaccine?   It isn't but they want to save your child from future liver cancer and what better chance do they have than to give it (and take the money) with the other childhood vaccines?

6.  The AIDS "virus" was introduced into the American population via a hepatitis B vaccine experiment

7.  As vaccine mandates have increased in the USA so it's child mortality has increased.

"In 1950 (before mass immunizations began), the USA had the third lowest infant mortality rate in the world. By 1986, the USA dropped to 17th place. In 1995 the USA dropped to 23rd and now the USA has dropped to the appalling position of 24th in the health of its children. But the USA is now first in vaccine compliance through government mandates."--Patti White RN

"The cot deaths increase occurred THREE MONTHS after the introduction of the nationwide blanket administration of the first Hepatitis B vaccine immediately after birth."--Hilary Butler

8.  People generally assume that vaccines are put through vigorous safety studies.  Not this one, some supervised by Merck employees:

"A small but growing minority of physicians and scientists are becoming aware that safety testings for the various vaccines have been woefully inadequate. As one of many examples, in 1994, a special committee of the National Academy of Sciences published a comprehensive review of the vaccine safety of the hepatitis B vaccine. When the committee investigated 5 possible and plausible adverse effects, they were unable to come to any conclusion for 4 of them because, to their dismay, they found that relevant safety research had not been done."--Harold Buttram MD

"In 1994 a special committee of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences published a comprehensive review of vaccine safety which had been commissioned by federal law. Of five possible and plausible adverse effects of the hepatitis B vaccination which the committee investigated, they were unable to come to any conclusion for four of them because they found to their dismay that the relevant research had not been done!"---Incao's Hepatitis B Vaccination Testimony

"No one could tell us what's wrong, but they do spout about how safe this vaccine is. Then they get very quiet when I ask them if they reviewed the safety studies."--Sherry Wied

"I have minutes from a CDC Study Group Meeting on the Hepatitis B vaccine held in March, 1997. The minutes of the meeting show that it would take at least a 60 day study to show the onset of MS. Clinical studies done by the two manufacturers were four and five days in length, respectively. It should be noted that the afternoon session of this meeting was chaired by Dr. Robert Sharrar of Merck."--Betty D. Fluck

[VaccineWebsite]

------------------------------------

Chilling evidence: Polio vaccine linked to cancer?


e-mail news:
Chilling News about a Vaccine You
Almost Certainly had as a Child…
Does It Have a Secret Cancer Connection?

What does a 12-year-old have in common with a 70-year-old?

Potential exposure to a virus that turns normal cells into cancerous ones...

Certain evidence points to a strong link between a vaccine you had as a child, and cancer… and the infection mysteriously extends to your children and grandchildren.

Mass vaccination campaigns of the 1950s and 1960s are now suspected in thousands of deaths per year via a cancer-causing virus contained in the early polio vaccines. But this doesn't mean you'll get cancer for sure. Keep reading and I'll explain. .

Researchers discovered this deadly vaccine tragedy in 1994 — when Dr. Michele Carbone found the SV40 virus in 60% of lung cancers (mesotheliomas) studied, 33% of osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers…

This is no monkey business!

Known as SV40, this virus came from dead monkeys whose kidney cells were used to culture polio vaccines. Over 98 million people in the U.S., plus more in other countries, were exposed to the contaminated vaccine.

And it appears there's a link to you, even if YOU were not vaccinated.

It turned out to be…

A medical marvel with a deadly glitch

Polio virus has been around forever — yet paralysis-causing epidemics have only existed since the late 1800s. In fact, 95% of polio cases occur without symptoms. Most victims just get a mild fever. But in a tiny fraction of 1% of victims, it penetrated the blood-brain barrier to cause paralysis or death… which naturally aroused much fear.

At the height of the polio epidemic in the early 1950s, the first polio vaccines were cultured in monkey tissue. The vaccine was rushed to market and made mandatory because of government panic and public hysteria about the disease.

From the beginning there were cries of "foul", accusations of poor manufacturing controls, and questionable efficacy.1

Then in the late '50s the monkey tissue was found to be contaminated with a virus that could be linked to cancer and other serious diseases… after it was too late and millions had received it.

Bernice Eddy, PhD, National Institutes of Health (NIH), discovered that a staggeringly high 70% of hamsters injected with kidney cell cultures containing SV virus died without apparent cause. She later discovered that tumors could be passed easily from one animal to another over a long time period while remaining cancerous.2

It was dubbed SV40 -- the fortieth simian virus found in monkeys' kidney cells.

"The Great Polio Vaccine Cover-Up"…

Eddy went public with this news — which enraged her boss at the NIH to no small degree. He tried everything he could to marginalize and discredit her — viewing her discovery as a direct threat to his career and a public health policy he staunchly supported.3

In June 1961, a letter from a colleague to the surgeon general detailed how Eddy's work was muzzled and repressed.4

Meanwhile by 1960, the Salk vaccine had been administered by injection to half the American public.

But there was a rival vaccine — the oral vaccine developed by Sabin. By mid-1960, sixty million Russians had received Sabin's oral vaccine (OPV) in field trials. It was pronounced a resounding success.

A group of Merck scientists led by Dr. Maurice Hilleman eventually proved both the Salk and Sabin forms were contaminated with SV40.

But the government purposefully kept this under wraps, warning neither doctors nor the public… while the vaccines continued to be given for years.

Eventually word leaked out… on July 25, 1961 the New York Times ran a story on page 26, quoting directly from the government's official press release.5

One news outlet opted against silence… On August 6th, 1961 the National Enquirer carried the year's most complete SV40 story, in an article entitled, "The Great Polio Vaccine Cancer Cover-Up…" running three pages long. Despite its tabloid status, the article contained amazing scientific quotes and an accurate recounting of Eddy's hamster experiments.6

The SV40 was so virulent, it became a popular tool of cancer researchers awed by its ability to transform healthy animal cells into tumor cells in test tubes. This tiny but mighty life form could completely disrupt cells, cause them to lose control of themselves, and to reproduce wildly.

Finally in 1994 Dr. Michele Carbone autopsied dead research animals to make a shocking discovery… SV40 was linked to the rare malignant mesothelioma — as well as to brain cancer and osteosarcoma (bone cancer).

Carbone's research found that SV40 causes mesothelial cells to become malignant 1,000 times faster than fibroblasts.7

Between 1997 and 2003, 25 new published studies showed presence of SV40 in mesotheliomas… 16 others found SV40 in brain, bone, and other cancers.8

In fact, one study showed the presence of SV40 infections in children born after 1982 — decades after the polio vaccine was supposedly cleaned up9,10. Why SV40 is apparently still spreading is a mystery.

SHOCKING revelations from a vaccine maker…

Initially, no one could fathom how SV40 was transmitted to humans.

That is… until Dr. Maurice Hilleman — head of Merck's vaccine program, developer of more than 36 vaccines, and recipient of a special lifetime achievement award from the World Health Organization — made shocking revelations before he died about Merck's responsibility in unleashing the SV40, as well as the AIDS virus.11

He also testified that the government kept SV40 contamination a secret to avoid public hysteria.

What we NOW know about SV40…

Disturbing new insights:

Documents now conclusively prove that SV40 was never removed from the vaccine stocks after 1963… SV40 tainted seeds were never thrown away — they were used in OPV (oral polio vaccine) for millions of children for nearly four decades12.
SV40 appears in 61% of all new cancer patients — including patients too young to have received the vaccine 40 years ago!13
Nearly 70% of mesothelioma cases test positive for SV40.
SV40 was found in 23% of blood samples and 45% of semen of normal individuals.14
SV40 can be transmitted sexually and through blood transfusions.15
Ten percent of those never exposed directly to tainted vaccines test SV40-positive.
Lancet published clear evidence that tainted polio vaccine is responsible for nearly half of the 55,000 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases per year.16
People from states receiving high-SV40 OPV now get osteosarcoma tumors at ten times the rate of those with SV40-free lot numbers.17

Are YOU from a high-exposure state?

Where did you spend your 1950s and 60s? Per NIH, these states had high SV40 vaccine exposure18:

Washington
Oregon
Wyoming
Utah
Minnesota
Iowa
Wisconsin
Illinois
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Washington DC
Maryland
Delaware
New York
Connecticut
Rhode Island
Massachusetts
Vermont
New Hampshire

Low exposure states:

California
Arizona
New Mexico
Colorado
Texas
Kansas
Nebraska
North Dakota
Missouri
Louisiana
Georgia
Tennessee
Kentucky
Ohio
West Virginia

Remaining states are theoretically SV40-free. But, cancer rates are also high in the United Kingdom and Italy, all of which had huge mass vaccination programs.

Scientific integrity or government cover-up?

Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist here — but consider…

When research went public in 1999, NCI declared there's "no evidence of human cancer linked to SV40". But other researchers contend that SV40 had already shown up in a wide variety of tumors — the highest rates in those receiving tainted OPV. Maybe that's not proof it's the cause but it certainly qualifies as a statistical "link"! And, in the science of identifying causes of cancer, correlations like this have long been considered evidence of probable cause.


The government and NIH have denied requests for grants to study SV40. Why?


Government denies a cancer link because of "those who are too young to have received the vaccine in the 1950s" — ignoring the potential of transmission via "shedding" (passing the virus to non-vaccinated people)… something the vaccine was specifically designed to do!
According to NIH, "the NCI is continuing to evaluate the possible link between SV40 infection and human cancers."19

But some in the scientific community question whether this "continuing evaluation" is being performed with total scientific integrity.
One article by an attorney, published in a peer reviewed scientific journal, accuses NCI of deliberately compromising a study that would have shown a link between SV40 and mesothelioma.20

Despite the government's foot dragging...

SV40 is one of the most widely studied viruses
in all of microbiology

For forty years, SV40 has been widely studied and well understood. Over 3,400 scientific articles name SV40 in the title… over 15,000 articles mention SV40.

SV40 was routinely used to create human cancers in the lab, to test cancer therapies.21

Moreover, it is now known how this virus causes cancer on a molecular level. SV40 oncogenesis is mediated by the viral large tumor antigen (T-ag) — which inactivates the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb.22

Experts in SV40 research finally announced SV40 is a class 2A human carcinogen.23

Good news: Not EVERYONE
who received SV40 will get cancer...

There is hope. Nearly every Baby Boomer received these vaccines forty or fifty years ago, and sadly, we can't turn back the clock for a do-over.

However, even Carbone, a leading SV40 expert, says, "… you need many different carcinogens, because different carcinogens do different things. Cancer is a multifactorial process."

No one factor can create cancer all by itself. Instead, your cells require numerous "hits" (insults) from various carcinogens.

But Carbone does consider SV40 one of the most potent human carcinogens.

He also goes on to state that cellular changes in your body (unlike a test tube) are influenced by the status of your immune system. A healthy immune system generally seeks and destroys invading viruses.

So, mitigate your personal risk by engaging in strategies known to enhance your immune system, such as:

Eating a mostly raw, organic, high-enzyme diet rich in vegetables… free of sugar, artificial sweeteners, and carbs.
Reduce calories, lose weight, exercise daily…
Control stress.
Give thanks for your daily blessings.
Detoxify yourself, your home, yard, and life as much as possible…

It does appear there's damaging evidence about polio vaccines, but we may never be 100% sure.

All the same, what's done is done. Move forward confidently with strategies known to reduce your risk. And at the same time, be wary and don't repeat the mistakes of the past.

Kindest regards,

Lee Euler,
Publisher

 

   No Change in pneumonia rates with Prevnar vaccines

"The rate of children who were hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia did not change significantly between the 1990s and during the past decade, despite introduction of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in 2000, according to research from the National Ambulatory and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys. "


http://www.pediatricsupersite.com/view.aspx?rid=81072


Posted on the Pediatric SuperSite on March 1, 2011

Outpatient CAP rates remain stable, despite vaccination


Kronman MP.

Pediatrics. 2011;doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2008.


The rate of children who were hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia did not change significantly between the 1990s and during the past decade, despite introduction of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in 2000, according to research from the National Ambulatory and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys.

The surveys also revealed that macrolides were frequently prescribed despite evidence that they provide little benefit over penicillins.

Matthew P. Kronman, MD, of the division of infectious diseases and division of general pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and colleagues used the surveys to identify children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). They looked at outpatient CAP rates and data surrounding broad-spectrum antibiotic use to treat the patients.

CAP visit rates ranged from 16.9 to 22.4 per 1,000 population, with the highest rates occurring in children younger than 5 years, with no variation after 2000, despite routine use of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar, Wyeth). The researchers said the vaccine may be preventing more serious cases of Streptococcus pneumoniae, but not some of the milder cases. This may explain another trend noted in the findings; notably, that from 2000 to 2007, there was about an 8% decrease in emergency visits, but a corresponding 8% increase in office visits related to S. pneumonia.

Physicians commonly prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics, including macrolides and cephalosporins. Penicillins were prescribed less frequently, about 14%, compared with the other antibiotics. The researchers said cephalosporin use increased significantly in the years after vaccine introduction. Increasing age, a visit to a nonemergency department office, and obtaining a radiograph or complete blood count were all predictive of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing.

The researchers said there were some limitations, including that the survey data did not include information on allergies or physical exam findings. Also, some of the cases may have been viral infections, not CAP.

Disclosure: The researchers reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[]

PERSPECTIVE

This large cross-sectional study utilizes a national database of pediatric hospital discharges representing approximately 89% of the estimated US population. Thus it offers a clear picture of trends in the rates of hospitalization of previously healthy children aged 18 years and younger with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and its local and systemic complications in 3-year intervals from 1997, 3 years before the introduction of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7, Prevnar, Wyeth), through 2006. Unfortunately, the database does not allow for identification of causative agents.

Following the introduction of PCV7 in 2000, the portion of young children receiving PCV7 quickly reached very high levels, which resulted in the virtual eradication of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) due to the serotypes in the vaccine in children younger than aged 5 years and a significant decrease in the circulation of the those serotypes in the pediatric and adult populations. Pneumococcal serotype replacement has resulted in a small increase in IPD, but the overall rate remains significantly lower than prior to licensing of PCV7.

Since the pneumococcal serotypes in the vaccine are no longer circulating, waning protection against these serotypes with a shift of disease to older children cannot be responsible for the noted increase in pneumonia and empyema. However, recent publications have documented an increase in the frequency of empyema amongst children admitted with pneumococcal pneumonia caused by individual pneumococcal replacement serotypes. Therefore, it is possible that some replacement serotypes are more likely to cause a necrotizing pneumonia with empyema, especially in younger children. Antibiotic resistance is common in replacement serotypes, particularly type 19A, which is now the most common serotype responsible for IPD, which could also contribute to a worse outcome in children with pneumonia.

Another likely explanation for the study findings is the recent emergence of more invasive strains of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. These strains carry one or more virulence factors which appear to increase the risk for necrotizing pneumonia and empyema. An increase in cases of pneumonia with empyema due to S. aureus has been noted in multiple pediatric centers during this time period. Severe secondary S. aureus pulmonary infection is being recognized more frequently following influenza in older children. Pneumococcus and Streptococcus pyogenes also cause secondary pneumonia with empyema following influenza.

Additional data, with outcomes tied to etiologic agents are needed. In the meantime, physicians caring for children should be aware of the increased potential for complicated bacterial pneumonia in previously healthy children, consider empyema in children not responding as expected to initial antibiotic therapy, and choose therapy appropriate for coverage of resistant strains of pneumococcus and S. aureus when empyema is suspected.

– Joseph A. Bocchini, MD

Infectious Diseases in Children Editorial Board member

Disclosure: Dr. Bocchini reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath   
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start March 4

-------------------------------------------------

Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review

Posted by Sharyl Attkisson
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20049118-10391695.html

For all those who've declared the autism-vaccine debate over - a new scientific review begs to differ. It considers a host of peer-reviewed, published theories that show possible connections between vaccines and autism.

The article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology is entitled "Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes--A review." [available here] The author is Helen Ratajczak, surprisingly herself a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm. Ratajczak did what nobody else apparently has bothered to do: she reviewed the body of published science since autism was first described in 1943. Not just one theory suggested by research such as the role of MMR shots, or the mercury preservative thimerosal; but all of them.

Ratajczak's article states, in part, that "Documented causes of autism include genetic mutations and/or deletions, viral infections, and encephalitis [brain damage] following vaccination [emphasis added]. Therefore, autism is the result of genetic defects and/or inflammation of the brain."

The article goes on to discuss many potential vaccine-related culprits, including the increasing number of vaccines given in a short period of time....

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath   
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start March 25 & April 1Click to add text, images, and other content

Big Pharma given total liability shield for vaccines!

 http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News.aspx

2nd Annual Valentines for Victoria Gala Raises Over $120,000 for Vaccine Safety & Informed Consent

V4V2011

 

 

Danny and Stephanie Christner
Valentines for Victoria co-founders Danny and Dr. Stephanie Christner hosted the 2nd annual Valentines for Victoria Gala benefiting the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) on Feb. 19. The event was created in remembrance of Victoria Christner, who died at five months old after reactions to childhood vaccines, to initiate dialogue and awareness about the need for vaccine safety and informed consent protections in public health policies.

Guests dined at the Southern Hills Country Club and danced the night away... click here to read more.

U.S. Supreme Court Betrays U.S. Consumer: Big Pharma Given Total Liability Shield for Vaccines

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), whose co-founders worked with Congress on the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (PL-99-660), is calling the U.S. Supreme Court's Feb. 22 decision giving drug companies total liability protection for injuries and deaths caused by government mandated vaccines a "betrayal" of the American consumer.

Court Ignores 1986 Act's Legislative Language and History

In a 6-2 decision, the Court majority voted to reject substantial evidence in the 1986 Act's language and legislative history that the 99th Congress fully intended to protect an American's right to sue a pharmaceutical corporation for injuries that could have been prevented if the company had elected to make a safer vaccine.

Victims of Vaccine Injury Thrown Under the Bus

NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe Fisher, said "Parents of vaccine injured children, who worked in good faith with Congress in the early 1980's on the 1986 law, have been betrayed by six American judges, who ignored congressional intent and threw victims of vaccine injury under the bus in order to give complete liability protection to a wealthy industry with a long history of hiding their products' risks. They have removed the safety net we were promised. If we had known this day would come, we would have vigorously opposed any federal legislation that limited civil liability for drug corporations now making substantial profits from vaccines mandated by government."

Hannah Brain Damaged by DPT Vaccine & Denied Compensation

Hannah Bruesewitz was brain injured by DPT vaccine as a child but she was denied compensation by the U.S. Court of Claims, which administers the federal vaccine injury compensation program created by the 1986 Act that has turned away two out of three plaintiffs... click here to read more and make a comment.

In the News

Mt, Lebanon Parent Loses Vaccine Battle - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a 1986 law prohibits a Mt. Lebanon couple from suing a drug company for the lifetime side effects their daughter suffers after receiving one of its vaccines. Defendant Pfizer Inc. and the American Academy of Pediatrics hailed the 6-2 decision as a victory for "life-saving" immunization. "Today's Supreme Court decision protects children by strengthening our national immunization system and ensuring that vaccines will continue to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in this country," read a release from the doctors' group.

Critics said the court left parents with no way to hold vaccine makers accountable and no feasible way to get compensation for the injuries suffered by their children. "As of today, you're on your own," said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center.

Fisher and other parents who worked with Congress to write the law were promised an alternative to the court system that would allow for quick and fair resolutions of their claims while enabling them to go to court if the alternative system didn't work, she said. "Had we ever known or imagined that this day would come, we never would have supported the legislation in the '80s," she said.
- Brian Bowling, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Feb. 23, 2011

 

.------------------------------------------------

Treating Autism with Bentonite Clay

This guest post was provided by Tina Turbin.

As a children’s author, researcher, and humanitarian, I have been growing increasingly alarmed at the growing number of autism diagnosis. Whereas in the 1980s, a study shows that 4 in every 10,000 children exhibited signs of autism, a study conducted recently by Cambridge University’s Autism Research Center showed that approximately 1 in 60 children have autism. Several years ago, I myself was diagnosed with celiac disease, caused by a reaction to gluten, a protein found in wheat, barley, and rye, after many years without proper diagnosis for my painful symptoms. I am now happily gluten-free and pain-free. Lucky to have been correctly diagnosed and had my symptoms handled with the natural treatment of a gluten-free diet, I am passionate about helping children to avoid the same pain of misdiagnosis and to find natural remedies for their health problems. According to a recent article on NaturalNews.com, one such natural remedy for autism is calcium Bentonite clay. I had to share this information!

 

Image: Tina Phillips / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The use of Bentonite clay has been rising in popularity in autism treatment centers. Calcium Bentonite clay, also known as “Living Clay” and one of the most sought-after for its healing properties, has a particularly strong negative ionic charge which magnetically attracts positively-charged substances such as bacteria and metals, for example, and absorbs them, eliminating toxins from the body. It is used both internally and externally and is a rather simple procedure. In autism treatment centers, Bentonite clay baths are used to safely remove metals and toxins from the body to increase the chances of success when used in conjunction with other therapies.

As autism diagnosis increases, so does the controversy over its causes. Most researchers seem to be searching for a genetic factor, but others are showing evidence of environmental causes. “There`s really the role for something in the environment that could be triggering someone who is genetically susceptible,” says Dr. Gary Goldstein, a child neurologist and director of the Kennedy Krieger Institute, located in Maryland.

The research supporting the impact of environmental toxins has spurred the search for detoxification therapies that can remove them from our systems. Already large numbers of doctors are recommending chelation and detoxification programs in conjunction with behavioral therapy for autistic children, noting that with these toxins removed, other therapies are more effective. Chelators are substances that fix themselves to heavy metals. Chelation therapies are typically effective, but they’re expensive and carry a higher risk of side effects such as headache, diarrhea, fatigue, fever, and cramps, particularly for children. Calcium Bentonite clay is considered more effective and safer for children.

While many autism clinics are citing successful results with clay therapy, its use isn’t being promoted to doctors due to the fact that clay can’t be patented by the pharmaceutical companies. Similarly, celiac disease affects 1 out of 100 Americans, and since its treatment is simply a gluten-free diet—requiring no pharmaceutical products, doctors are failing to recognize the symptoms of the disease and diagnosis it correctly, leaving only three percent of celiacs properly diagnosed. However, just as in the cause to increase celiac and gluten-free awareness, by taking it upon ourselves to promote natural therapies for children’s autism, we will surely bring about increase awareness about the effectiveness of calcium Bentonite clay treatment, just as I’ve witnessed awareness of celiac disease and gluten-free grow a great deal over the years.

About Tina Turbin

Tina Turbin is a multi award-winning children’s author, writer, researcher, humanitarian and mother of three talented and successful children. Working for many years in LA with children in the Entertainment Business, she remains to be an active supporter of children, families, schools, education and works diligently in the arena of Celiac Disease. Her Danny the Dragon children’s series fulfills a passion of hers to delight and entertain through her enchanting characters. Her style of writing conveys to the young and young at heart. Ms. Turbin resides in her East and West Coast studios.

60 Lab Studies Link Vaccine to Cancer

This is horrifying, please watch.

 http://members.beforeitsnews.com/story/428/775/60_Lab_Studies_Link_Vaccine_To_Cancer.html

 http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/02/18/leading-vaccine-doctor-states-cancer-linked-to-polio-vaccine.aspx


Dr. Mercola's Comments:

For starters, the HPV vaccine Gardasil, which is being vigorously pushed on unsuspecting young girls and women to theoretically guard against cervical cancer still has never been proven to actually prevent cancer. On the contrary, evidence suggests that under certain circumstances the vaccineincreases your risk of precancerous lesions by nearly 45 percent, and an ever increasing number of girls are being seriously injured by this unnecessary vaccine.

As of December 13, 2010, 20,915 adverse reactions had been reported in the United States alone, including 89 deaths, 297 miscarriages or stillbirths, and 370 reports of abnormal pap smears post vaccination.

All of this from a vaccine that has only been on the market for four years!

Making matters worse, as of 2009 the US FDA approved Gardasil for use on young boys as well, and the first male death has also been reported. In September of last year, a young boy died just eight days after being vaccinated with Gardasil.

So what's going on here?

Is it possible that vaccines sold by drugmakers like Merck are causing lethal disease? Judging by history, the answer may be yes.

Contaminated Polio Vaccine Responsible for Human Cancer Cases

In 2002, the journal Lancet published compelling evidence that contaminated polio vaccine was responsible for up to half of the 55,000 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases that were occurring each year.

What was it contaminated with?

SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus. The puzzle began in 1994, when Dr. Michele Carbone, a Loyola University researcher, found the virus SV40, which had never before been detected in humans, in half of the human lung tumors he was studying. Since then, 60 different lab studies have confirmed the results, and SV40 has been found in a variety of human cancers, including lung-, brain-, bone-, and lymphatic cancer.

At first no one could fathom how the virus had been transmitted into the human population.

But in the censored interview with Dr. Maurice Hilleman above, Hilleman admits Merck's responsibility in unleashing this virus via their polio vaccine, as well as the likelihood that there was an importing and spreading the AIDS virus in the same manner.

Just Who is Dr. Maurice Hilleman?

Now, for those of you who may think Dr. Hilleman was just another crackpot (he passed away in 2005), think again. He was, and still is, the leading vaccine pioneer in the history of vaccines. He developed more than three dozen vaccines—more than any other scientist in history—and was the developer of Merck's vaccine program.

He was a member of the U.S. National Academy of Science, the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society, and received a special lifetime achievement award from the World Health Organization.

When he was chief of the Department of Respiratory Diseases with what's now the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, he discovered the genetic changes that occur when the influenza virus mutates, known as shift and drift. He was also one of the early vaccine pioneers to warn about the possibility that simian viruses might contaminate vaccines.So Dr. Hilleman knew what he was talking about. And in his own words, "vaccines have to be considered the bargain basement technology for the 20th Century."

Vaccines Can Cause the Very Disease They're Meant to Prevent, and Worse

For years, researchers suggested that millions of vials of polio vaccine, contaminated with SV40, infected individuals between 1953 and 1963 and caused human tumors, and by 1999, molecular evidence of SV40 infections were showing up in children born after 1982. Some experts now suggest the virus may have remained in the polio vaccine until as late as 1999.

Still, the FDA and health authorities turned a blind eye.

In addition, just like Gardasil may well increase your risk of cervical cancer rather than reduce it, the live polio vaccine has also been found to cause polio. And, in rare instances the virus in the vaccine has even been known to mutate into a much deadlier version.  As reported by MSN News in 2009, genetic analysis has proven such mutated viruses have caused at least seven separate outbreaks in Nigeria. 

According to the CDC the last case of wild polio in the US—meaning polio caused naturally and not due to the live polio vaccine—occurred in 1979. From 1980 through 1999, there were NO wild polio cases in the US. Instead we had 144 cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) caused by live oral polio vaccine.

Polio outbreaks in Haiti and the Dominican Republic in 2002 were also traced back to a strain of oral polio vaccine (OPV) that mutatedback to virulence.

According to a report by Neil Z. Miller of the Global Vaccine Institute, the live polio virus from the vaccine can remain in your throat for one to two weeks and in your feces for up to two months. So not only is the vaccine recipient at risk, but he or she can potentially spread the disease to others.

In 1999, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that the United States replace the live-virus vaccine with an inactivated "killed" virus vaccine, which is what remains in use today. However, the inactivated polio virus vaccine has not been without its share of serious side effects either.

Rotavirus Vaccine Contaminated with Pig Virus

Last year, the US FDA suspended the rotavirus vaccine Rotarix after an independent lab discovered it was contaminated with "a substantial amount" of DNA from the porcine circovirus. In pigs, this virus causes poor growth, weight loss, weakness, enlarged lymph nodes, skin rashes, difficulty breathing, jaundice, stomach ulcers, and sudden death.

As expected, both the FDA and GlaxoSmithKline spokespeople stated that the contaminated Rotarix vaccine carried no known human health risks. However, this is easy to say since there are no studies to confirm or deny a link between these viruses and human disease.

In the case of the polio vaccine, the link between the SV40 virus and human cancer wasn't discovered until 40 years later!  It is actually surprisingly common for vaccines to contain various animal matter, including foreign animal tissues containing genetic material (DNA/RNA).

Once the Rotarix contamination was discovered, new technology was used to test eight infectious attenuated viral vaccines, and in addition to Rotarix, two others contained "unexpected viral sequences":

  1. A measles vaccine was found to contain low levels of the retrovirus avian leukosis (AVL) virus—a virus known to cause cancer in chickens. This despite the fact that vaccine manufacturers have been required to use eggs from leucosis-free stocks for over 40 years.
  2. Rotateq, Merck’s rotavirus vaccine, was found to contain a virus similar to simian (monkey) retrovirus—the SV40 virus previously linked to human cancer.

Are you willing to bet that they a) know what they're talking about, and b) are telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth about the potential health dangers of all these vaccines?

HPV Vaccine Now Routine for Boys as Well...

So far, very few parents have voluntarily lined up their sons for the HPV vaccine, but that may soon change. As reported by Paging Dr. Gupta, the American Academy of Pediatrics' 2011 schedule of recommended routine vaccines for children and teens now includes the HPV vaccine for boys aged 9-18 as well.

Folks, this is a disaster in the making. I shudder to think about the statistics we'll see in a few years if parents fall for this nonsense.

I urge you to consider the risks already revealed in the four short years since Gardasil came on the market. Already, there are close to 21,000 reported incidents of adverse effects and death, despite the fact that only two out of every 10 women in the approved age group have gotten the vaccine so far.

Add to this the fact that an estimated 90 to 99 percent of all adverse effects are never reported, and the abnormally large risks of the HPV vaccine compared to other vaccines should give most people reason to pause.

Although the FDA ultimately dismisses all side effects, including deaths, as being within the norm, even they have stated that:

"In VAERS, a higher proportion of Gardasil reports were of syncope [fainting] and VTEs [venous thromboembolic events] compared with other vaccines."

And according to the National Vaccine Information Center, the incidents of miscarriage and still birth events from Gardasil supersede the same event from all other vaccinations.

According to a recent Sane Vax press release on PR Log:

"There is no doubt the vaccine's safety and efficacy has not been thoroughly investigated. And independent investigation on the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix must be conducted before there are more injuries and deaths."

What's most frustrating about this is that not a single one of these 21,000 children and young women needed to be harmed or die.

Why?

There are still outstanding questions about whether HPV is or is not the direct cause of cervical cancer. The FDA knows there are many other co-factors involved with the development of cervical cancer, and as of 2003 acknowledged that "most infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer." The same news release also states that "with proper screening, cervical cancer is avoidable, and if caught early, curable."

In essence, three years before the HPV vaccine came upon the scene, they knew that what was needed—if anything—was simply improved screening methods, such as regular pap smear testing for girls and women that are far less risky than getting an HPV shot.

Interestingly, and disturbingly, routine pap smears have DECLINED, coinciding neatly with the release of the HPV vaccine. Between 2007 and 2010, cervical cancer screening rates declined by nearly 7 percent, the New York Times reported in December of last year.

When you consider that the HPV vaccine increases your risk of cancer if you're already infected with certain types of HPV, this is a double-whammy of bad news since rarely, if ever, are girls and women given HPV pap screening before they get an HPV shot.

It's all madness! Not only is the HPV vaccine is one of the most unnecessary vaccines on the market, it is also the most dangerous! And now they want to unleash it on young boys, and they're trying to get it approved for older women as well.

Weighing Benefits versus Risks

Even without a potential contamination scare, there are serious risks to every vaccine. The HPV vaccine is a perfect example. So before vaccinating you really need to be certain that the benefits will outweigh those risks.

In the case of Rotarix, along with RotaTeq (a similar vaccine made by Merck), the benefits are very questionable, especially if you live in the United States or another developed country. Typically, when a child in the United States contracts rotavirus, and most do in infancy and early childhood, all that is required is lots of rest, good nutrition and plenty of fluids to prevent dehydration from diarrhea. This infection also provides natural immunity that will protect your child for life.

Along with showing little benefit for a disease that is typically entirely treatable with fluids and rest, a recent drug review by the FDA found that Rotarix is associated with an increase in pneumonia-related deaths in children, compared to a placebo. 

So with this particular vaccine, children living in developed countries like the US are potentially taking on serious risks with what appears to be very little benefit -- and that was before the contamination was uncovered.

In the case of the HPV vaccine (Gardasil and Cervarix) the choice is clear. It has a high rate of risk and the potential benefits are unproven:

  • In more than 70 percent of cases, HPV clears up on its own within a few weeks or months. In over 90 percent of cases, it's gone within two years, causing no symptoms or disease.
  • Only about 26 percent of girls and women ages 14 to 59 have been exposed to any HPV strain at all; and
  • Only 2 percent have been exposed to strains 16 or 18 – the two that Gardasil and Cervarix protect against – meaning this vaccine is completely unnecessary because HPV infection very rarely leads to cancer.
  • Women whose partners wore condoms during vaginal intercourse are 70 percent less likely to become infected with HPV. That's a FAR greater level of protection than you can get from this vaccine!

For more in-depth information about the HPV vaccine along with the top 10 reasons why you don't need it, please see this previous article.

The moral of the story?

Do your homework before subjecting your children to any vaccine. A great way to get started is to simply use the Search Feature at the top of each of my Web pages and search my site as it contains a litany of research on vaccine safety, and the lack thereof. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) also provides well-referenced information on vaccines and diseases, such as HPV, rotavirus and polio.

Paranormal_Research
_____________________________________________________

Dr. Maurice Hilleman made astounding revelations in an interview that was cut from The Health Century -- the admission that Merck drug company vaccines had been injecting dangerous viruses into people worldwide.

Bear in mind that Dr. Hilleman was the developer of Merck's vaccine program. He developed over three dozen vaccines, more than any other scientist in history. He was a member of the U.S. National Academy of Science, the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society. He received a special lifetime achievement award from the World Health Organization. Hilleman was one of the early vaccine pioneers to warn about the possibility that simian viruses might contaminate vaccines.

Sources:

 


 

 

Gluten free diet reversed autism 

.Fox News Video: Boy with Autism Recovers After Gluten-free Casein-free Diet

February 14th, 2011 by John Libonati

Ethan Fox never slept more than two hours at a time.  He did not speak.  He ran continuously, day and night, until he would collapse from exhaustion.  After a short nap, he would awaken and run again. 

At one year of age, Ethan was diagnosed with autism.  At 20 months, after being written off by other physicians, he was placed on a gluten-free, dairy-free diet by Dr. Kenneth Bock, autism specialist and author of “What Your Family Needs To Know About Autism Spectrum Disorders.” 

According to Ethan’s mother, Tracy Fox, results were seen within three days on a gluten-free, dairy-free diet. Ethan slept through the night, spoke his first words and has never had a problem since.  Now age 6, he is at the top of his class at school with a 97%  average…and virtually no one knows he was ever diagnosed with autism.

http://glutenfreeworks.com/ 

-------------------------------------------

 

Merck Drug Co have routinely injected
cancer viruses (SV40 and others)
into people worldwide.



From: Forbidden Knowledge TV <newsletter@forbiddenknowledgetv.com>

This segment of "In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood
& Bioterrorism," produced and by consumer advocate,
Dr. Leonard Horowitz, features the world's leading
vaccine expert, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, who explains
how Merck's vaccines were responsible for spreading
AIDS, leukemia and other cancers worldwide.

This explosive interview was conducted by medical
historian, Edward Shorter for WGBH Boston public
television with Blackwell Science. It was cut from
the show, "The Health Century" due to the huge
liability associated with Dr. Hilleman's admissions.
Namely, his statements that Merck Drug Company vaccines
have been routinely injecting cancer viruses (SV40 and
others) into people worldwide.

Besides spreading AIDS into the human population, these
vaccines are thought to be the main cause of the increased
incidence of cancers over the past few decades.

Video:

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/page/998.html

- Alexandra


P.S. Please share Forbidden Knowledge TV e-mails
and videos with your friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

=================================================
Alexandra Bruce
Forbidden Knowledge TV
Daily Videos from the Edges of Science
http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com

==================================================
Forbidden Knowledge TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco CA, 94115
USA

-----------------------------------------------------------

Cancer cells in your vaccines - NYTimes.com

Posted by: "Sheri Nakken" vaccinedangers@gmail.com   vaccineinfo1234

Sat Feb 5, 2011 10:11 am (PST)



For half a century, biotechnology companies and scientists have used
the astonishingly hardy
<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/cancer/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier>cancer
cells that killed Henrietta Lacks to develop countless medical
breakthroughs and establish a multimillion-dollar industry selling
her cell line, known as HeLa ...

<http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/01/st_henrietta/>HeLa, the first
human cells to grow outside the body, have been used in more than
60,000 experiments involving leukemia,
<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/parkinsons-disease/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier>Parkinson's
disease and
<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/aids/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier>AIDS.
They were instrumental in developing the
<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/specialtopic/polio-immunization-vaccine/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier>polio
vaccine,
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/chemotherapy/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>chemotherapy,
cloning, gene mapping and in vitro fertilization.

<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/05/books/05lacks.html?ref=arts>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/05/books/05lacks.html?ref=arts

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email
courses - next classes start February 4

 

Former Pharma Scientist Speaks Out About Vaccines

 

Former Pharma Scientist Speaks Out About Poisons in Vaccines:

Scientist Reveals Damage and Death Cover-ups, How and Why Poisonous Vaccines Are Mandatory, and Hushed 

Former Pharma Scientist Speaks out about Vaccines

http://www.vaclib.org/basic/manu.htm

Horrific Testimonials after babies and children received vaccinations
http://www.thinktwice.com/stories.htm

Tempe AZ...courts ordered vaccines over mother's wishes...children immediately damaged
http://poisonevercure.150m.com/case_of_janet_burton.htm

Which are the 18 states that allow vaccination exemption based on philosophical reasons?
http://www.douglassreport.com/deardd/081112.html

All States Exemption Information...Scroll Down
http://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm

Washington State Exemption Information
http://www.vaclib.org/exempt/washington.htm

 

More People Dies From the Swine Flu Vaccine than Swine Flu

 

http://anovelspot.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/more-people-died-from-the-swine-flu-vaccine-than-swine-flu/

I’ve followed the opinions of Dr. Mercola for over a decade,  he does a good job of separating industry driven hype from consumer-centric need-to-know facts. Since I found the information helpful I’m passing the link on to you.

Critical Alert: The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?

American health officials declared apublic health emergency as cases of swine flu were confirmed in the U.S. Health officials across the world fear this could be the leading edge of a global pandemic emerging from Mexico, where seven people are confirmed dead as a result of the new virus.

On Wednesday April 29th, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its pandemic alert level to five on its six-level threat scale,1 which means they’ve determined that the virus is capable of human-to-human transmission. The initial outbreaks across North America reveal an infection already traveling at higher velocity than did the last official pandemic strain, the 1968 Hong Kong flu.

Phase 5 had never been declared since the warning system was introduced in 2005 in response to the avian influenza crisis. Phase 6 means a pandemic is under way.

Several nations have imposed travel bans, or made plans to quarantine air travelers2 that present symptoms of the swine flu despite the fact that WHO now openly states it is not possible to contain the spread of this infection and recommends mitigation measures, not restricting travel or closing borders.

Read the full story

***update 10.22.2009 There is no compensation for individuals injured by the current swine flu vaccine and you can’t sue your doctor even in instances of gross negligence.

 

 

NYTimes - Vaccine fuses the genes for parasite proteins onto a genetic backbone

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/health/21gates.html?src=dayp&pagewanted=all

In an interview, Mr. Gates sounded somewhat chastened, saying several times, “We were naïve when we began.”

As an example, he cited the pursuit of vaccines that do not need refrigeration. “Back then, I thought: ‘Wow — we’ll have a bunch of thermostable vaccines by 2010.’ But we’re not even close to that. I’d be surprised if we have even one by 2015.” ...

The first attaches vaccines to nanoparticles that can be absorbed by the skin inside the nostrils. Dr. James R. Baker Jr., director of the University of Michigan’s nanotechnology institute, said it works with hepatitis B and flu vaccine. ...

The second thermostabilized vaccine the foundation is still backing is a complex one against malaria. It fuses the genes for parasite proteins onto a “genetic backbone” from vaccines against smallpox and a chimpanzee virus.


Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath  
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

37 Narcolepsy cases in Finnish children after vaccinations

 

37 narcolepsy cases in Finnish children developed after swine flu vaccinations/ YLE

From YLE print and TV in Finland:
...  Thirty-seven children in Finland came down with narcolepsy soon after being injected with the vaccine against swine flu.

Some of the children have sustained serious brain damage that has made it impossible for them to attend school. They suffer from symptoms including hallucinations, personality changes and cataplexy, which is a severe muscle weakness that can lead to a complete collapse up to 20 -30 times a day.

The Chancellor of Justice has received 14 complaints regarding ties between GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the manufacturer of the swine flu vaccine, and the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)...  The Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL ) maintains that cooperation with pharmaceutical companies is standard practice for professional organisations.

Posted by Meryl Nass, M.D. at 4:21 PM

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath  
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start December 2 & 3, 2010 and January 6 & 7

 

Warning: Gardasil may cause increased risk of cervical cancer

Problem too is that even if they find what they say is evidence of HPV it doesn't mean you have anything that is lasting.  Many test positive and later test negative.
too many lies about so-called viruses
Sheri


Warning, Gardasil may cause increased risk of cervical cancer
http://www.examiner.com/x-40801-Vaccines-Examiner~y2010m6d30-Warning-Gardasil-may-cause-increased-risk-of-cervical-cancer


Would you consent to giving your child a vaccine that caused an increased risk of cancer? That may be exactly what you are doing when you consent to Gardasil.

According to Information the manufacturer of this vaccine presented to the FDA prior to approval, if a person has already been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection Gardasil increases the risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%. (See VRBPAC Background document, bottom of page 13) This documentation was presented on the 18th of May 2006.

That statement bears repeating, if you have been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection and take the vaccine, you increase your risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6%.

Is this information advertised? No! This information was actually presented to the FDA by Merck. It came from their own safety trials. The FDA did not respond by recommending screening for HPV prior to vaccination. The FDA did not even demand a warning be included in the package insert.

Now, Merck's research is indicating that Gardasil may also 'provide cross-protection' against other strains of HPV that are closely related to HPV 16 and 18. (see this article on Medpage Today) This means prior exposure to these additional strains may pose an increased risk for cervical cancer also, if combined with vaccination.

No one appears to be concerned with the increased risk of vaccination combined with prior exposure, as long as you take the vaccine. You will see no advertisements indicating the possibility of increased risk of the very cancer this vaccine is supposed to help you avoid.

Government officials will not be informed of the potential danger. They will be told HPV is the most common sexually transmitted virus in the country and that it must be eradicated. They will be told this vaccine should be mandatory.

As a consumer, you must protect yourself. If you are sexually active or suspect you may have been exposed to HPV, ask your doctor to screen for HPV prior to taking Gardasil. If he, or she, does not know why, educate them. After all, it is your future at stake.

44.6% increased risk of cervical lesions/cancer; or HPV screening before consenting to vaccination -- it is your decision. Please, make it an informed one.

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath  
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start September 2010

 

What every parent should know BEFORE vaccinating their child

 

What Every Parent Should Know BEFORE Their Childen Are Vaccinated! Why are a growing number of parents and health care professionals around the world questioning vaccination? The controversy stems from the thousands of deaths and permanent disabilities attributed to vaccination annually, as well as the many published medical studies, government statistics, 

What Every Parent Should Know BEFORE Their Childen Are Vaccinated - pictures from the CDC about the side effects of vaccinescongressional testimonies, and other credible sources that directly contradict commonly held assumptions about vaccine safety and effectiveness.

Bart Classen, a Maryland physician, published data showing that diabetes rates rose significantly in New Zealand following a massive hepatitis B vaccine campaign in young children, and that diabetes rates also went up sharply in Finland after three new childhood vaccines were introduced.

More pictures of vaccine damage available to view at the CDC website

In fall 1997, two influential professional magazines featured articles asking the question: Has the decrease of infectious diseases in childhood through the mass use of vaccines been replaced with an increase in chronic diseases such as diabetes and asthma? The Economist, a prestigious international magazine read by world leaders in government, business and public policy, and Science News, a magazine read by both

 health care professionals and the general public, explored the reported links between vaccines and chronic diseases in their November 22, 1997 issues.

This child died as a result of vaccines (CDC website)

Congressman is calling for criminal penalties for any government agency that knew about the dangers of thimerosal in vaccines and did nothing to protect American children.Congressman Dan Burton (R-Indiana) during Congressional Hearing: "You mean to tell me that since 1929, we've been using Thimerosal, and the only  test that you know of is from 1929, and every one of those people had mennigitis, and they all died?" For nearly an hour, Burton repeatedly asked FDA and CDC officials what they knew and when they knew it. (Thimerosal contains a related mercury compound called ethyl mercury. Mercury is a toxic metal that can cause immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions.)  
Vaccines: deception and tragedy  
Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) or Vaccine-Induced Encephalitis? 
Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) 
AUTISM: is there a vaccine connection? 
Library - Books and Journals: Vaccine Controversy 
Juvenile diabetes and vaccination: the connection 
Can vaccines cause immune dysfunction resulting in allergies, asthma and anaphylaxis?

 Homeopathy can be used successfully to prevent and 

treat smallpox,measles,whooping cough,chickenpox, and other ailments.

Would you allow big brother to enforce vaccinations on your kids?Government Enforced VaccinationsVaccination Tracking Registry - Government programs that limit your choices -and your rights- in health care when it comes to mandatory vaccination. These mandates last for 40 or so years and they're impossible to repeal. Also, learn about Legal Requirements and Exemptions 

Are Vaccines Damaging Our Pets? 
Routine Vaccination: Is it really safe and effective?  Most recently, an article appeared in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association entitled "Are We Vaccinating Too Much?" Read about the comments of veterinarians who believe that vaccines are damaging our pets. 

Homeopathycan be used successfully to prevent and treat smallpoxmeasleswhooping cough,chickenpox, and other ailments. 

 

With recalls at an all time high, see the newest scam

With all of the over-the-counter (OTC) pediatric meds on recall it makes it seem they are targeting babies and children!

_______________________________________________________________________________
 With Recalls at an All-Time High, Meet Big Pharma's Newest Scam

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/09/08/warning--prescription-and-otc-drug-recalls-soaring.aspx

Posted By Dr. Mercola | September 08 2010 | 28,144 views

Recalls of prescription and over the counter drugs are surging in the U.S. The FDA reported more than 1,700 recalls last year, compared to less than 430 in 2008.

One single company, drug repackager Advantage Dose, accounted for more than 1,000 of those recalls. But even excluding Advantage Dose, recalls jumped 50 percent last year.

CNN reports:

“The fast pace of drug recalls seems to be continuing in 2010 ... High-profile recalls of Tylenol and other products ... have drawn attention to quality concerns in manufacturing ...

The spike in recalls, especially of generic and over-the-counter drugs, is being driven by manufacturing lapses, experts say. Some of the biggest culprits: the quality of raw materials, faulty labeling and packaging and contamination.”

Sources:
  CNN August 16, 2010
 

Dr. Mercola's Comments:
 

CNN's chart, below, shows the number of drug recalls between 2006 and 2009. Over the initial three years, recalls kept inching upward, only to spike dramatically between 2008 and 2009, from 426 recalls to 1,742.

That’s an increase of 309 percent in one year!


A single drug repacker, which has since been shut down, accounted for over 1,000 of those recalls, but even if you discount that one rotten apple, drug recalls still rose by over 50 percent.

Recent Drug Recalls Revisited

As recently as May, drug maker Johnson and Johnson voluntarily recalled all unexpired lots of certain over-the-counter (OTC) pediatric drugs, including Tylenol, Motrin, Zyrtec and Benadryl products, after they discovered “manufacturing deficiencies that could affect the quality, purity or potency of the medicines.”(A full list of the products affected by the recall can be found at this link.)

The recalled products were found to contain either:

Higher concentration of active ingredient than specified
Inactive ingredients that may not meet testing requirements
Tiny particles of unspecified origin
Amazingly, that was the second mass recall of these types of OTC drugs within less than a year.

In September of 2008, 21 children’s and infant’s Tylenol liquid products were deemed potentially unsafe due to bacterial contamination found in one of the inactive ingredients.

With all these recalls occurring, how can any health conscious consumer trust the safety or the effectiveness of any of these drugs?

I find it astonishing that while drug prices in general are soaring, drug manufacturers are still using rising costs as an excuse for failing to produce high-quality, pure products.

How about getting by with a little less profit in order to ensure each product is at minimum free of contamination and contains the specified amount of ingredients?

After all, as of 2007, the pharmaceutical industry was worth more money than the gross domestic product (GDP) – which is the market value of all the output produced in a nation in one year -- of entire COUNTRIES, including Belgium, Sweden and Switzerland, according to statistics from the World Bank.

In fact, if placed on the list ranking the countries of the world according to gross domestic product, the pharmaceutical industry ranked number 17 out of 185 countries in 2007!

But apparently, that’s still “not enough”…

Next Step You Need to be Aware of - - the Switch from Drugs to Vaccines

As the patents on many blockbuster drugs are expiring, and Big Pharma is increasingly found liable for damages from dangerous drugs, drug companies have shifted their focus from drugs to vaccines.

There are currently vaccines against everything from obesity to smoking, and even stress, in the pipelines – health concerns that have precious little to do with bacterial or viral infections, which is the basis for the vaccine theory in the first place (and even that theory is up for discussion).

Aside from being potentially dangerous to the extreme, why is this trend so troubling?

In a nutshell: Lack of liability.

Drug companies have fiercely defended every single drug ever recalled as being safe and effective – until definitively proven dead wrong, and sometimes they still wouldn’t fess up to their culpability.

The same shameless, misleading strategies used for drugs are being used for vaccines.

But with vaccines, not only are the health risks far greater for you and your family, the subsequent liability for the drug company is greatly reduced or even eliminated!

So you take ALL the risk, while the drug companies demand your trust, take your money, and avoids any legal actions should your life be destroyed by one of their vaccines.

From a drug maker’s perspective, vaccines may be one of the absolute “safest” products to make, because their liability is negligible to non-existent, depending on the vaccine.

Pandemic vaccines are 100 percent risk-free for the vaccine maker, as laws ushered in after 9/11 exempt them from ANY liability. And, making matters worse, the laws create a negative incentive to test it for safety, because if they are fully aware of problems, then they could potentially be held liable for willful misconduct! It’s in their best interest to know as little as possible about the adverse reactions their vaccine might cause.

Non-pandemic vaccine injuries fall under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which is a no-fault federal vaccine injury compensation program. But again, very few vaccine injured children ever receive compensation from this program, and as explained in this previous article, the program is so seriously flawed as to be useless.

Getting back to the issue of recalling dangerous medicines, without liability, what incentive is there to voluntarily recall a vaccine when dangers or serious problems are discovered?

None!

The HPV vaccine Gardasil has obvious problems that have led to 53 recorded deaths of vibrant, healthy young girls, and yet everyone is moving on like nothing is the matter. No recall. Not even an official warning.

So should we buy into the promises of safe, pure, effective vaccines, when history has shown us that mistakes occur FAR more frequently than anyone would dare to guess – both in drug and vaccine manufacturing?

The answer, of course, is up to you. But they won’t be getting my vote of confidence anytime soon.

Deception at an All Time High

Adding to this debauched mess is the rise in out-and-out deception, as Prevent Disease describes so well in this recent article.

It’s become very apparent that disinformation operations are at an all-time high – or at least it is the most OBVIOUS campaigning we’ve ever been privy to.

Prevent Disease, in an attempt to demonstrate the outright lies by national governments and the media, highlights three examples from the last year alone — the H1N1 scandal, airport body scanners, and the BP oil disaster.

According to Prevent Disease:

“... [T]he H1N1 scandal reached its pinnacle in the fall of 2009 ... From radio, internet, television, newspapers, magazines, outdoor posters, signage and promotions, you could not escape the flu hype campaigns so diligently pursued by all the malicious agendas at play who only wanted one thing — to promote a dangerous H1N1 vaccine.

After hundreds of reports exposed the criminal activity by all levels of government, we left the same people in power to do it all over again.”

And when news first unfolded about the BP oil disaster, the immediate response was to cover-up, deny, and respond with ignorance. In the end, a private company was permitted to use extremely potent toxins to mask the extent of their environmental crime while putting tens of thousands, if not millions of American’s health at risk.

Prevent Disease goes on to list “25 rules of disinformation,” employed with great success by a number of individuals with the intent to “prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them.”

It may be well worth your time to read through them, as being aware of how the con is done will help you avoid being conned in the first place.

Who Do You Trust, and Why, Exactly?

Another interesting article that ties in here was published in the British Guardian, under the headline: “Drug firms hiding negative research are unfit to experiment on people. Another pharmaceutical giant has settled a big compensation claim. So why are they allowed to go on misleading the public?”

That is becoming the ten thousand dollar question…

Why are drug companies ALLOWED to continue maintaining the status quo despite being caught lying, defrauding, even knowingly killing, time and time again?

And perhaps even more intriguing, why is the public still falling for their tactics?

Just how many bizarre and devastating side effects must be rattled off at the end of a drug ad before it grabs your attention and make you question its stated benefit?

I believe that humans inherently want to trust and depend on authority. The question is, at which point does critical thinking and pure self-preservation kick in? It seems we’re still waiting for critical mass to be reached when it comes to this point, but I think we’re getting closer…

One such authority that have been granted full trust are scientists, employing the scientific method to prove or disprove the causes of health, disease, and drug safety, among many things.

But even in these prestigious vestiges of medicine, we’re now finding more and more evidence of corruption that threatens the entire premise of the scientific method. Dr. Beatrice Golomb, MD, PhD has shared shocking information about the underbelly of medical science in this newsletter, as well as Dana Ullman.

If you missed either of those interviews, I highly recommend reviewing them now.

Ullman also has a phenomenal column in the Huffington Post, where he recently wrote:

“Doctors today commonly assert that they practice "scientific medicine," and patients think that the medical treatments they receive are "scientifically proven."

However, this ideal is a dream, not reality, and a clever and profitable marketing ruse, not fact.”

Recent court cases highlight the truth of what Golomb and Ullman discuss. For example, it was discovered that AstraZeneca purposefully “buried” studies with unflattering results for their drug Seroquel.

The Guardian’s Ben Goldacre writes:

“In trial 15, patients with schizophrenia who were in remission were randomly assigned to receive either Seroquel, or a cheap, old-fashioned drug. After a year, the patients on Seroquel were doing worse. These negative findings were left unpublished.

… Here is the opening of another email in that quetiapine case. Richard Lawrence writes in an internal memo to colleagues: "Lisa has done a great smoke and mirrors job on trial 15.””

Smoke and mirrors… Ain’t that the truth! And that is oftentimes what you’re using when making decisions that affect your health.

In the case of Seroquel, this smoke and mirrors job led to tens of thousands of people developing drug-induced diabetes, in addition to not actually working as advertised... Once these buried studies were unearthed, AstraZeneca ended up paying off more than 17,500 patients who had developed diabetes and related illnesses.

Again, I remind you that class action lawsuits against drug manufacturers for vaccine damage is not an option. They rigged the game years ago and effectively lobbied Congress to make it illegal to sue them for any vaccine related injuries.

So, beware jumping on the vaccine bandwagon for every ill.

Healthy Lifestyle – Not Pills or Injections – is the Answer to Your Health Problems

It should be self evident by now that the idea of synthetic chemicals being the answer for your health problems is FALSE.

However, there are certain basic tenets of optimal health that have remained permanent truths, regardless of the claim-of-the-day spouted by modern science, and these include:

Eat a healthy diet that’s right for your nutritional type, paying very careful attention to keeping your insulin levels down. This typically involves increasing your consumption of whole (preferably organic) foods, while avoiding processed foods and sugary drinks of all kinds, as they are loaded with fructose, genetically modified ingredients, and chemicals.
Drink plenty of clean water
Address your day-to-day stress
Exercise
Get plenty of appropriate sun exposure
Limit your exposure to toxins
Consume healthy fats
Eat plenty of raw food
Optimize your insulin and leptin levels
Get plenty of sleep
Remember, leading a common sense, healthy lifestyle is your best bet to produce a healthy body and mind, and increase your longevity. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, and even government itself sure won't make it easy for you to avoid the garbage that ruins your health.

The drug industry spends about $15 billion a year manipulating and distorting your perceptions about the proper solutions for your health challenges. And, the food industry spends TWICE that much to brainwash you and your children to choose highly processed convenience foods that will accelerate your path toward death and disease -- and your need to use drugs to control your symptoms.

It’s a vicious cycle of deceit and misinformation!

Fortunately, you can still take self-responsibility, educate yourself, make better, healthier choices, and be a living testament to what the truth of the matter really is.

By adhering to the basic tenets of optimal health – the basics of a healthy lifestyle, not just a temporary fix for a particular ailment -- you are building a healthy mind and body, and thereby safeguarding yourself against a multitude of health problems and serious diseases.


Related Links:

 

Babies that participated in vaccine trial died

 If the globalization of clinical trials for adult medications has drawn little attention, foreign trials for children’s drugs have attracted even less. The Argentinean province of Santiago del Estero, with a population of nearly a million, is one of the country’s poorest. In 2008 seven babies participating in drug testing in the province suffered what the U.S. clinical-trials community refers to as “an adverse event”: they died. The deaths occurred as the children took part in a medical trial to test the safety of a new vaccine, Synflorix, to prevent pneumonia, ear infections, and other pneumococcal diseases. Developed by GlaxoSmithKline, the world’s fourth-largest pharmaceutical company in terms of global prescription-drug sales, the new vaccine was intended to compete against an existing vaccine. In all, at least 14 infants enrolled in clinical trials for the drug died during the testing. Their parents, some illiterate, had their children signed up without understanding that they were taking part in an experiment. Local doctors who persuaded parents to enroll their babies in the trial reportedly received $350 per child. The two lead investigators contracted by Glaxo were fined by the Argentinean government. So was Glaxo, though the company maintained that the mortality rate of the children “did not exceed the rate in the regions and countries participating in the study.” No independent group conducted an investigation or performed autopsies. As it happens, the brother of the lead investigator in Santiago del Estero was the Argentinean provincial health minister ...


In 2007, residents of a homeless shelter in Grudziadz, Poland, received as little as $2 to take part in a flu-vaccine experiment. The subjects thought they were getting a regular flu shot. They were not. At least 20 of them died.

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/01/deadly-medicine-201101?currentPage=all __

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath  
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses - next classes start December 2 & 3, 2010 and January 6 & 7


«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»

§ Health_and_Healing - PULSE ON 21st CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE & WORLD NEWS

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Health_and_Healing

Subscribe send email to: Health_and_Healing-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Educational Alternative Medicine Web site:
http://ElementsOfHealth.webs.com

GREAT PRICES on energy products Plus Green Calcium Bentonite Clay INTERNAL/EXTERNAL   http://www.HolisticEnergyStore.com/

THE OPEN LINE NEWSPAPER, HEALTH NEWS, SPIRITUAL, ENVIRONMENT, ETC. http://WWW.THEOPENLINE.ORG 

ENERGY HEALING TECHNIQUE FOR CHRONIC PAIN, PTSD & OTHER ISSUES THAT TROUBLE YOU.  http://vibrantenergy.webs.com

Personal Experience from Heather UK

 Posted on other lists by permission from Heather in the UK

A good many years ago my childrens' school was part of a mass vaccination drive in England where MR was pushed to all the chilren. (measles and rubella) There was no mumps component as it was the time when the mumps strain was being changed. I believe at the time there was a need to use up these stocks of MR in readiness to bring in the new MMR mix, although it was of course 'sold' to the public via warnings that a measles epidemic was expected.

As well as being a parent, I was also a school governor. In that capacity I managed to get the wording of the letter to parents changed from the school encouraging and supporting this to the school facilitating it and making it clear it was the parents' choice. Not much but all I could get agreement for.

I made myself available on vax day as a volunteer to help out. Was very glad I did when I spotted my own son being steered in with his class. On approaching his teacher to ask why he was there when his consent form had clearly been marked with no - very prominently, I was told the teacher didn't actually read them as he just assumed everyone would have said yes!

A few days later scores of children, including my own daughter who had not received the vaccine, came down with a soaring temperature, headache,stiff neck, and sensitivity to light. Our homoeopath actually treated her as though she had vaccinosis, even though it was acquired second hand. She was lucky, several of her friends ended up in hospital being subjected to lumbar punctures. Our homoepath said he saw many cases of exactly the same thing amongst other school populations after this vaccination drive. I have no idea if there is any official record of it....

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath   
Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA
Vaccines - http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com
Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy Online/email courses

 

-------------------------------------------

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703555804576101502771928070.html?mod=wsj_share_facebook  
Japan Nears Final Settlement on Hepatitis B Lawsuit  
By YUKA HAYASHI  TOKYO—The Japanese government will soon reach  formal agreement to settle a massive class-action  lawsuit involving people who contracted hepatitis  B through childhood vaccination, expected to cost  up to 3.2 trillion yen ($39 billion) in damages  to compensate hundreds of thousands of victims.  The long-fought lawsuit, originally started in  1989, is a legacy of the time when needles and  syringes were routinely reused to inoculate a  number of children to save costs, a practice that  persisted in Japan until 1988. Victims' groups  estimate nearly half of the nation's 1.3 million  hepatitis B patients and carriers had contracted  the virus this way. The government's damages  estimate is based on projections that a total of  33,000 patients and 400,000 carriers will seek  compensation over the next 30 years.  The breakthrough in the case came when a national  umbrella association of plaintiffs accepted on  Saturday the terms of a settlement recommended by  a district court in Hokkaido, one of the 10  locations where the case is being fought across  the nation. The court recommended on Jan. 11 more  generous payments to victims than those proposed  by the government: 36 million yen ($440,000) for  those with liver cancer or serious cases of  cirrhosis. Furthermore, carriers with no symptoms  will receive 500,000 yen, plus the costs of biannual checkups.  The plaintiffs had hoped their case would reach a  successful settlement under the government of  Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who had earned fame  while serving as health minister in the mid-1990s  for holding public-health officials responsible  in a case involving HIV-tainted blood products  that made many Japanese sick. In a speech  delivered at the opening of a parliament session  Monday, Mr. Kan pledged "sincere effort" to  respond to the latest court settlement. The  government announced its intention to settle the  case after the Jan. 11 court recommendation.  After formally announcing the settlement within  the next several days, the government is expected  to initiate parliamentary discussions for setting  up a framework to pay for the settlement, a move  that would put further strains on Japan's already  debt-laden public finances. "We'd like to ask for  understanding from everyone in the nation that  this framework needs to be supported and  shouldered by all of us," Ritsuo Hosokawa,  minister of health, labor and welfare said in a  recent press conference. A bond issuance or  appropriation of funds from the social security  pool are among the steps being considered, according to the Japanese media.  One significant feature of the settlement was the  pledge to compensate "all victims," whether they  can provide proof linking their cases to  childhood inoculation, such as vaccination  certificates dating back decades. This paves the  way for all hepatitis B patients to receive  compensation, except those known to have  contracted through other channels such as blood transfusion.  "The settlement is more sympathetic to the  plaintiffs than we had imagined," said Mieko  Taniguchi, who leads the plaintiffs' association.  "We are still dissatisfied with the compensation  for the carriers. Given their feelings and  sufferings, we really want to see more gets done  for them." Ms. Taniguchi, 61, who has fought  chronic hepatitis for over two decades, has a  daughter and a grandson who are carriers of the  virus. Plaintiffs say the carriers, though  healthy, also suffer from significant damages,  including the frequent discrimination they face  as they seek employment and marriage partners.  

 

Google Translator

Recent Videos

2888 views - 0 comments

Testimonials

  • "THANK YOU VERY MUCH for wonderful information on "THYROID and IODINE" I am a registered Homeopath (UKHMA). The article will assist me in helping to understand many more Molecu..."
    Evelyn Smith
    "THYROID and IODINE"

Super Share

Share on Facebook